Can anyone think of a writer opposite of Marx in the sense that the philosophy sounds unappealing and horrible?

almost universally, but the application has had markedly useful benefits, and its original proponent remembered as great; RATHER than a man like Marx, whose work has at various times since publication, enjoyed great popularity and whose ideas sound appealing to a large segment of the population, YET he is quite reviled now because of the historical attempts to put his thoughts into action. Remember my original question now, but don't let that deter you from general comments on K. Marx.